Wednesday, 20 April 2011

Final Post - Summary

Thank you for joining us for our final blog post on HVPC. After today, we feel confident that you will know everything that you need to in order to effectively treat a patient using HVPC. We have covered a lot in the series of blog posts, so today we will give you a one paragraph summary with the essential information to hopefully tie it all together and answer any lingering questions you have left.

High voltage pulsed current (HVPC) is an estim device named after the fact that as pulse duration decreases, higher voltage or current is needed to illicit a response. The pulse duration for these devices are generally permanently set to a duration of 20-200 µsec – a pulse duration range that targets soft tissue. The device gives off a twin peak pulsed monophasic current; the second peak occurs within the refractory period and does not stimulate a physiological response, but is perceived to provide patient comfort. Some charge accumulation occurs in the tissue due to its current which aids in its purposes. Uniquely, HVPC devices use 4 active electrodes and 1 large dispersive pad to compete the circuit. HVPC devices also have a polarity switch, positive (+) or negative (-), which gives the operator options depending on its purpose for treatment. The evidence supporting the use of HVPC are generally old, use animal subjects and are of poor design and quality. In saying that, there are a few interesting case studies and the general summary is HVPC is effective for wound healing (its best indication for use), reducing edema and pain modulation. HVPC has fallen out of favour as a treatment of choice for physiotherapists and are not commonly seen.

We would like to thank everyone who has been following our posts. We hope that you have enjoyed our blog and that it has been informative.

Signed,
A & M

Sunday, 17 April 2011

Purchasing a HVPC Device

I know that many of you have been checking this blog religiously in hopes we would share with you how one could purchase a HVPC device. Today is that day. You will be surprised to know that HVS devices are not commonly found in Australia; however they are of course more readily available in the USA. A prescription is required for the general public to purchase a HVS machine, but a prescription is not needed for clinicians or physiotherapists. It must be noted that some devices are class 2, meaning they are lawfully restricted to use by a licenced health care professional. HVS devices can be purchased online from a vast number of electrotherapy medical suppliers and range in prices depending on the features and model of the device.
$232  www.healiohealth.com









$1295 arizonadme.com/

These portable HVS machines come with:
·         user and instruction manual
·         large dispersive electrodes
·         packs of four reusable or disposable electrodes
·         lead wires
·         9V Batteries
·         10V adapter to reduce the use of batteries.
·         carry case

Features of these devices include:

·         Power: 9V
·         Output: 0-350V maximum adjustable amplitude
·         Wave form: Twin peak monophasic, 100µs fixed interpulse interval
·         Pulse rate: 1-120Hz adjustable frequency
·         Pulse duration: 5µs
·         Interpulse interval: 100µs
·         Mode: continuous, alternating
·         Single channel
                               
HVS devices may be purchased and used to assist wound healing, muscle spasm, soft tissue injuries, and inflammation. The patient can expect to feel a relatively comfortable stimulatory sensation with the use of this device. This is due to the combination of very short pulse duration and high peak current, but low total current per second (microcurrent).

This is our last post in which we introduce facts regarding HVS. We have touched on all the informaton you will need to safely and effectively use HVS as a treatment modality. Our next and final blog will be a summary of everything we have touched upon to help tie all the loose ends together. Please join us to finish the discussion.

A & M


References:
http://www.healiohealth.com/tek9.asp?pg=products&specific=jnmrqmkno
http://www.koalatyproducts.com/galvanic.html
Robinson, A.J., Snyder-Mackler, L. (2007) Clinical Electrophysiology: electrotherapy and electrophysiological testing, 3rd Ed. Lippincott & Wilkins
Knight, K.L., & Draper, D.O. (2007) Therapeutic modalities: the art and the science. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Contraindications, Dangers, Precautions & Considerations for Use

Last blog, we quickly mentioned how we as physiotherapists can actually slow down the rate of healing or possibly cause more damage. It is thus very important that we as physiotherapists are properly educated regarding the use of electrophysical agents as they can be a danger to some of our patients. Don’t forget, 1 of the 4 absolute ethical principles of the Australian Physiotherapy Association (APA) is to cause no harm.
Please take special note to not apply HVPC if any of the following are present:
·         cardiac pacemakers,  all electronically implanted devices – may interfere with normal device functioning
·         malignancy – possible risk of enhancing the spread of the tumour
·         broken or anaesthetic skin – risk of skin burns or irritation
·         thick scarring or adipose tissue – have high electrical resistance, restricting current flow and therefore the effectiveness of treatment
·         pregnancy – possible risk of affecting normal fetal growth and development
·         advanced heart disease or arrhythmias
·         undiagnosed pain
·         epilepsy


The device should not be applied:
·         trans-cerebrally – that is leg to arm, arm to arm, anterior to posterior or left to right sides of the chest wall. We do not want any conduction going through the heart…not good!
·         over the carotid sinus
As with the use of all estim devices, safety precautions must be followed including:
·         hand washing before and after treatment
·         informing the patient about the device and gaining their consent
·         performing a sensory discrimination test on the patient
·         testing the device on yourself to ensure appropriate function
·         cleansing of the skin prior to use
·         appropriate electrode position
·         ensuring the patient stays awake at all times during treatment
·         A bell or alerting device left with the patient when left alone

The patient can expect to feel the following sensations with the associated frequencies used for (Belanger, 2002):
·         wound repair, acute edema reduction
o   prickling pins and needles over the smaller electrodes
o   little sensation over the large dispersive electrode
·         acute pain reduction
o   moderate prickling pins and needles
·         muscle contraction
o   moderate prickling pins and needles progressing to a strong contraction

The patient should not feel uncomfortable or any pain at any time throughout the treatment. It is vital the patient informs the therapist if this occurs so the cessation or moderation of treatment can occur immediately.

Considerations for Use

The type of electrode used with HVS, as well as electrode placement and arrangement depends on the treatment area as well as the type of therapy/ therapeutic effect required. As with the use of all estim devices the correct electrode placement is essential to ensure the current flows through the target tissue.
Electrode types (Belanger, 2002):
·         Rubber carbon electrodes
·         Stainless-steel hand held probes
·         Sock or electromesh glove electrodes

Electrode arrangement:
HVG uses 4 small ‘active’ electrodes and one ‘ineffective or dispersive’ large electrode to complete the current circuit.
One large, dispersive electrode combined with any of the following (Belanger, 2002):
Carbon rubber electrodes with moist sponge
·         1, 2, or 4 active electrodes
·         1 handheld active electrode


Electrodes should be used with:
·         Electroconductive gel
·         Moist sponge or gauze


Because HVS machines produce monophasic waveforms, the output polarity of electrode leads does not change during stimulation. Therefore, most devices allow the user to select and manually switch the polarity of the output leads.
A polarity switch is used to make the active electrode/s either positive or negative:
·         Positive electrode:
o    placed over the wound
o   attracts macrophages and promotes epithelial growth.
o   Blood clot formation around the wound
·         Negative electrode:
o   placed on the skin surface closest to the wound
o   increases blood flow
o   stimulates fibroblastic growth, collagen production, epidermal cell migration
o   inhibits bacteria growth

Most treatment begins with negative polarity to encourage any blood clots to dissolve and to increase inflammatory by-products, which help to heal the damaged tissues.
Monopolar or bipolar techniques may be used:
·          Monopolar: wound healing, when treatment is over a large area such as edema reduction
·          Bipolar: muscle contraction, or chronic pain
Now that all of the safety issues have been considered, what are the advantages and disadvantages associated with a HVS device?
Advantages of HVS include:
·         Safety
o   constant voltage
o   less pulse charge with shorter pulse duration
·         shorter pulse duration
o   enhances patient comfort
o   reduces skin impedance resulting in optimised tissue penetration
clinically versatile in function and discrimination of these responses is easy to obtain
o   sensory effects
o   motor effects
o   pain reducing effects
·         may be used with water
o   minimal chemical effects at the skin surface
o   no salt is needed to neutralise skin surface chemical reactions
·         promotes wound healing
·         can be applied to immobilised body part

Disadvantages of HVS include:
·         lower average current
o   cannot produce as strong a contraction as NMES

·         lack of evidence regarding some of its uses
o   twin peak current
o   use for muscle contraction

Unforunately, we are nearing the end of our informative blog on HVPC. Before we finish up on the topic, we will touch on how to get your hands on a HVPC device for your physiotherapy clinic or person use. We will quickly mention that there is an informative handout on HVPC which we have referenced throughout the blog. Please be sure to have a look if you are interested: https://arizonadme.com/uploads/Instructional_Handout_Sterling_Impulse_HVG_Part_2.pdf

Until next time,

A & M

References:
Bèlanger, A. (2002). Evidence-based guide to therapeutic physical agents. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Pg 109-122
Knight, K.L., & Draper, D.O. (2007) Therapeutic modalities: the art and the science. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Tuesday, 12 April 2011

Evidence

As promised, we are back and ready to share the evidence behind HVS. If you have tried searching for good research for HVS use, you may have had the same problem we did: many of the research articles available are old (decades) and the majority use animal subjects. As you know, randomized control trials (RCT) are the highest quality evidence and we discovered that there aren't many recent RCT which use human subjects. We also realized pretty quickly that many of the research articles had poor design. There were too many variables not controlled for in numerous studies which has blurred the evidence and support behind HVS.  Am I right? Well, do not worry. We have spent countless hours looking for quality research on your behalf. Believe us when we say there is supporting research, you just have to find it!

Peters et al., 2001
·         Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study examining the dose and effect of HVS on diabetic foot ulcers
·         Treatment parameters
o   50V x 80Hz x 10 mins + 50V x 8Hz x 10 mins + 40 mins break
o   The HVS device ran at night for 8 hours in hopes of increasing patient compliance
·         Results

o   65% of patients using HVS had their ulcers heal compared to 35% of the control group after 12 weeks
o   Healing also increased as a function of treatment time



Houghton et al., 2003
·         examined the effects of HVS on chronic wounds due to venous and arterial insufficiency
o   subjects in the study had full thickness ulcers for >3 months
·         treatment parameters
o    intervention group: 150V x 100 Hz x 45 mins, 3x a week for 4 weeks
o   Sham treatment group
·         Results
o   HVG reduced wound surface by approx 50% of original size
o    rate of wound closure was 2x faster than that of the control group (sham treatment)
o   individuals with bilateral ulcers had faster wound closure of HVG treated ulcers compared with the sham treatment they received on the contralateral limb


Snyder et al., 2010
·         performed a systematic review on the effects of HVS on edema control in animal models
o   studies reviewed used HVS in acute trauma and used limb volume as an outcome measure
·         treatment parameters
o   most studies used 30 mins treatment + 30 mins rest for 4 hours;  frequency 120 Hz, intensity of 90% of visual motor contraction
·         results
o   small to large HVG treatment effect sizes for edema control after an acute injury, suggesting HVG to be an efficacious modality for the treatment of edema

Fitzgerald et al., 1993
·         case study on the use of HVPC for the treatment of a large infected wound of thoracic spine following surgical procedure
·         treatment parameters
o   100V x 100 Hz x 60 mins, 5x a week for 10 weeks
o   20 mins of negative polarity + 40 mins of positive polarity
·         Results
o   Sometimes, a picture is worth a thousand words

A series of photos showing the wound at the beginning of treatment, 5 weeks after treatment and 9 weeks after treatment

Mendel et al., 2010
·         Examined the effects HVS had on grade I and II lateral ankle sprains on return to sport times
·         Treatment parameters
o   Near continuous HVS for 72 hours post injury
o   Subsensory intensity, 120 Hz
·         Results
o   No difference between intervention and control groups in grade II sprains return to sport times
o   HVS delayed return to sport time in grade I sprains
·         Discussion
o   After reading these results, I bet you are wondering why I’ve chosen to include this article
Although we believe this was a poorly designed study, this does not undermine the fact that there is no miracle device which will heal various conditions. We cannot possibly expect to put an estim device on every condition and expect it to resolve without any other interventions. Estim devices are simply a tool we as physiotherapists can use to assist in the healing process. We cannot increase the rate of healing, but we can impede it, which is why we are constantly reminded to “do no harm.” Our job is to create an environment which will optimize tissue healing – that is where estim comes into play. Never forget that there is always a role for functional exercises in the rehabilitation program!
Speaking of “doing no harm,” join us next time for our post on the contraindications of HVS use.
A & M

References:
Fitzgerald, K.G. & Newsome, D. (1993). Treatment of a large infected thoracic spine wound        using high voltage pulsed monophasic current. Physical Therapy, 73(6), 355-360.PMID: 8497510
Houghton, P., Kincaid, C., Lovell, M., Campbell, K., Keast, D., Woodbury, G. & Harris, K. (2003). Effect of electrical stimulation on chronic leg ulcer size and appearance. Physical Therapy, 83(1), 17-29. PMID: 12495409
Mendel, F., Dolan, M., Fish, D., Marzo, J. & Wilding, G. (2010). Effect of high-voltage current on recovery after grades I and II lateral ankle sprains. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 19, 399-410. PMID: 21116009
Peters, E., Lavery, L., Armstrong, D. & Fleischli, J. (2001). Electric stimulation as an adjunct to heal diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82, 721- 725. PMID: 11387573
Snyder, A., Perotti, A., Lam, K. & Bay, C. (2010). The influence of high-voltage electrical stimulation on edema formation after acute injury: a systematic review. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 19, 436-451. PMID: 21116012